ACAB meme #2

The content presents a CAPTCHA-style image with the instruction 'Select all images with bastards'. It displays nine photos of individuals in police uniforms, all of which are marked with ticks, indicating they have been selected. This implies that the content creator is labeling all police officers as 'bastards', which is a derogatory term.

RULE 1, TARGETS A MARGINALIZED GROUP: The content does not target a marginalized group. Police officers, as a profession, are not considered a historically or systemically discriminated against group. While the content is clearly critical and offensive towards police, it does not qualify as toxic speech under this rule.

RULE 2, PRESENCE OF A POWER IMBALANCE: The content appears to be speaking back to power rather than from a position of power. Police officers generally hold positions of authority and institutional power in society. The image critiques this power dynamic, potentially highlighting issues of police misconduct or abuse of authority. Even if the speaker's position is unclear, we can assume they do not hold more power than the police institution.

RULE 3, SUBORDINATION: While the term 'bastards' is certainly derogatory and disrespectful, the content does not appear to treat police as inherently inferior or less deserving of basic human rights. Rather, it seems to be a harsh criticism of perceived misconduct or systemic issues within law enforcement. The image does not promote exclusion, harm, or discrimination against police officers as individuals, but rather expresses strong disapproval of the institution they represent.

In conclusion, while the content is provocative and uses offensive language to criticize police, it does not meet the criteria for toxic speech as defined in the policy. It does not target a marginalized group, speaks back to power rather than from it, and does not subordinate or dehumanize its targets in a way that reinforces systemic discrimination. Instead, it appears to be a form of political criticism, albeit expressed in a crude and inflammatory manner.

The content appears to be a CAPTCHA verification test that asks users to 'Select all images with bastards'.

The test includes nine images of people in police uniforms, each of which has been selected with a tick mark, suggesting that all police officers are being referred to as 'bastards'.

While the term 'bastards' is derogatory, police officers as a group are not considered a historically or systemically marginalized group.

The content does not appear to come from a position of power, given that police are generally viewed as figures of authority.

There is no clear indication that the content is intended to subordinate or dehumanize police officers in a way that reinforces systemic discrimination.

The image presents a CAPTCHA test prompting users to 'Select all images with bastards' and features nine photos of uniformed police officers, each marked with a checkmark. By presenting all police officers as already selected, the image implies that all police officers are 'bastards.'

This content targets police officers as a group. However, police officers are not a marginalized group that has historically been subject to systemic discrimination.

While the term 'bastard' is used to denigrate police officers, it does not reinforce existing power structures that disadvantage or oppress people based on their profession. Therefore, the language does not subordinate police officers in a systemic sense.

The image is likely intended as a criticism of police officers. The use of the term 'bastard' expresses strong disapproval, possibly motivated by concerns about police brutality or misconduct.

The content presents a CAPTCHA verification image with instructions to 'Select all images with bastards'. This suggests that the term 'bastards' is being used to refer to the individuals depicted in the nine images, who are all wearing police uniforms.

Police officers, while they may face criticism or distrust in certain contexts, are not considered a marginalized group that is subject to systemic discrimination based on inherent characteristics such as race, gender, or sexuality. As such, this content does not meet the criteria for targeting a marginalized group under the policy.

The content does not appear to come from a position of clear power or privilege over the target group. While police officers may hold institutional authority, the format of a CAPTCHA verification does not inherently reflect a power imbalance.

However, the use of the derogatory term 'bastards' to refer to all police officers depicted in the images does suggest an intent to treat the target group as inferior or unworthy. This language, while offensive, does not necessarily meet the threshold for 'toxic' speech that reinforces systemic discrimination against a marginalized group.

Overall, while the content is provocative and uses derogatory language, it does not appear to violate the policy on toxic content targeting marginalized groups. The target group, police officers, are not considered a marginalized population under the policy, and the content does not clearly reflect a power imbalance or an intent to subordinate the group based on their inherent characteristics.

The content presents a CAPTCHA verification which asks users to 'Select all images with bastards' and shows nine photos of people in police uniforms, each with a tick mark, indicating they have been selected.

The term 'bastards' is used pejoratively in this context, implying a strong negative sentiment toward the individuals depicted in the photos. The language is derogatory and intended to demean.

Rule 1 requires the content to target a marginalized group that has been historically and systemically discriminated against. Police officers, as an institution, do not represent such a group but are seen as figures of authority and power. Therefore, targeting them with such language does not violate Rule 1.

Rule 2 examines the presence of a power imbalance. Police officers typically hold positions of societal power and authority, and derogatory language directed at them does not reflect an imbalance where the speaker is in a dominant position over a marginalized group. The content instead reflects a position that critiques or disrespects authority rather than one of systemic oppression.

Rule 3 considers whether the content treats the target group as inferior. The use of the term 'bastards' is derogatory and implies a lack of respect, which can be seen as an attempt to portray police officers as inferior. However, considering they are figures of authority, this does not meet the policy's definition of subordination which focuses on reinforcing systemic discrimination against marginalized groups.